CHALLENGE 5 : Optimising treatment plans for kids in rehab

Challenge Statement: How can we improve our scheduling to allocate resources to enable delivery of the optimal therapy dosage for children referred to iRehab (intensive rehabilitation at PCH) and Rehab in the Community (RiC) to tailor therapy and allocate resources efficiently: funding, workforce, and community clinics?  

Supporting Mentors

  • Sue-Anne Davidson – Kids Rehab WA, PCH  
  • Rowan Johnson – Allied Health Coordinator for Rehab in the Community, Kids Rehab WA, PCH 
  • Rae Robinson – iRehab Coordinator, Kids Rehab WA, PCH 

Potential Focus Questions 

This is a complex Challenge, and you may find it useful to consider the following questions when building out your prototype: 

 

  • What is the optimal therapy dosage for children referred to iRehab and RiC? 
  • Can you build a composite variable from the outcome measures to use in predicting optimal dosage?  
  • Or, are there three models required (i.e., one for each outcome measure) and if so, which is the best predictor? 
  • Which change (3, 4 or 5) on the self-care domain of the WeeFIM [see Critical Concepts section for WeeFIM explanation] is the best one to use to predict optimal dosage? 
  • What is the most efficient way to schedule the multidisciplinary workforce resources to optimise therapy dosage?  
  • What is the ideal geographical positioning for RiC clinics in Perth metropolitan regions, considering current therapist resources and potential future growth? 
  • How do we schedule travel time for the RiC workforce to maximise time with children and families? 
  • RiC clinic locations: consider benefits of scale with co-locating clinical therapy services (choice of appt times for families, collegial support for clinicians, variety of clinic spaces, specialised equipment) vs travel requirements for families to attend clinic appointments, for example travelling to PCH often takes more than 45min drive, plus parking challenges. 

Critical Concepts 

Kids Rehab WA deliver paediatric rehabilitation services through several programs at PCH and in the community and may be supported by therapists in WA country health services. You may want to talk to Challenge 5’s Mentors about the following ideas as you develop your prototype:

  • WA Health is the system manager for public health service providers. The health service providers for children and young people are; the Child and Adolescent Health Service (CAHS), comprised of the Perth Children’s Hosptial (PCH), Child and Adolescent Community Health (CACH), and the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS). The WA Country Health Services (WACHS) provide primary and secondary paediatric services to children in regional WA and work with CAHS’ teams to optimise outcomes for children and families who access CAHS services.  
  • Kids Rehab WA provide tertiary health services for children with neurodisability, including cerebral palsy, acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury and genetic syndromes. Therapy is directed towards specific health needs including rehabilitation after a medical incident, a new diagnosis in an infant or a brain injury in a child, or after a medical or surgical procedure, for example orthopaedic surgery for children with cerebral palsy. 
    • Kids Rehab is a Department of PCH and is divided into multiple clinical programs. iRehab and RiC are two of those programs. 
  • Kids Rehab WA provides therapy which is episodic, goal focused, time limited and delivered by a multidisciplinary team of medical, allied health and nursing staff. This is different to NDIS services, which provide maintenance therapy and ongoing support across the lifespan. 
  • Intensive (high frequency) intervention is often required to aid recovery and maximise goal attainment, but there are other important activities for children to participate in, such as family time, education, community activities and play. These are often referred to as the F-Words in Childhood Disability.   
  • Optimal therapy dosage is the number of therapy sessions in each discipline that will achieve the desired therapy outcomes or goals. Targeted levels of change for iRehab and RiC programs, based on minimal clinically important difference (MCID) measures, are:  
      • Goal activity performance and satisfaction rated by child or parent on a 1 to 10 scale, increments of 1 unit 
      • Pre and post intervention measures completed. Difference between these are the change scores  
    • Attain score of zero or higher using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) 
      • Goal activity score more objective, based on pre-determined goal criteria; therapist-assessed score 
      • -2 to +2 scale, increments of 1 unit 
      • The WeeFIM is an 18-item performance measurement system that documents self-care (8 items), functional mobility (5 items), and cognitive (5 items) abilities as three subcategories, that are summed for a total score. Each item is scored from 1-7, in 1-unit increments, for a possible total score of 126.  
      • Pre and post intervention measures completed. Difference between these are the change scores 
      • iRehab uses WeeFIM regularly, RiC does not (see above 2 measures for RiC) 

 

Some of these assessments are completed on forms purchased from a publisher; we will bring some blank hard copies of the forms to the Hackathon briefing for reference. 

  • Information links about: 
      • Some diagnoses are not CP, but present similarly to CP and undergo some of the same treatment. These are referred to as “CP-like” conditions. Keep an eye out for “HSP” or “hereditary spastic paraplegia”; as the most common CP-like condition. 
    • Others: there are many other causes of childhood disability 
      • More commonly: Global Developmental Delay (GDD) / Intellectual Disability (ID) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Many kids with CP, ABI or SCI may have ID or ASD as well 
      • There are also many Rare Diseases that, when combined together, make up a significant cause of disability in children 
  • iRehab is delivered at PCH and children and families attend up to 5 days (usually 2 – 3 days) per week and receive multiple contiguous sessions from the iRehab team. Factors that influence the offered days per week include: 
    • Age of child 
    • Child fatigue 
    • Family circumstances such as work commitments, school drop-offs, travel time and distance. 
  • iRehab scheduling is done manually in multiple excel spreadsheets for each individual child to plan multidisciplinary interventions for up to ten children per day for six to eight weeks, sometimes up to six months.  
    • Scheduling planner – manual entry by iRehab Coordinator of weekly schedule 
    • Year planner – manual entry by administrative assistant, copied from Scheduling planner which provides multi-year view of schedule. Excel data repository. Unstable and unable to export data neatly. 
    • Printable calendar – weekly view generated by year planner 
  • Children attend RiC for therapy 1-2 times per week (once week most common) for physiotherapy and/or occupational therapy. RiC scheduling is simpler than iRehab because patients only see one therapist per day. Scheduling is done manually across multiple Outlook calendars. One calendar for each clinic location, with different therapists working on different days.  
  • Workforce resources are organised by the types of clinicians (known as “disciplines”) involved: 
    • Allied Health disciplines- Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Pathology 
      • See the “What therapies are involved?” information sheet 
    • Other resources which we will consider later, but don’t have the data model at present –  
      • Allied Health Assistant  
      • Nursing 
      • Medicine 
      • Psychology 
    • Another refinement for future work is inclusion of phases of intervention, which inform scheduling of therapy dosage and resources, however we cannot provide data for easily yet.  
      • Phases of intervention are elicitation, stabilisation, mass practice and generalisation. Elicitation and stabilisation require a highly trained workforce to co-design, implement and modify tailored therapy interventions, while the mass practice stage is suited to use of Allied Health Assistants, who follow a set program with the child, with regular reassessment by specialised clinicians. 

Supporting Data Sets 

The Paediatric Rehabilitation Information System (PRIS) has data for patient demographics and episodes of care drawn from webPAS. There is also data which classifies children by diagnosis, Kids Rehab programs they are receiving care from, assessment tools and outcomes.  

This dataset has been synthetically created by Kids Rehab WA for the WA Health Hackathon 2024. 

The PRIS variables available for this Challenge are:  

  • Age group – 0-2, 2-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 years 
  • Postcode group – Metro North, Metro South, Metro East, Metro West, Metro Central, Regional, Remote 
  • Diagnosis group – cerebral palsy (CP), acquired brain injury (ABI), spinal cord injury (Spinal) or other. 
  • Interventions (yes/no) – surgery, botulinum toxin injections, inpatient rehab for spinal cord or acquired brain injury or missing 
  • Program- 
  • iRehab 
  • Rehab in the Community 
  • Dosage 
  • Number of outpatient program admissions 
  • Length of stay (number of weeks in each program) 
  • Episodes of care per admission 
  • Episodes of care– Outpatient appointments for  
  • iRehab  
  • SP, PT, OT, Psychology 
  • RIC 
  • PT, OT 
  • Change in outcome measures between program admission and discharge 
  • Change in COPM 
  • COPM domains 
  • Change in GAS  
  • Change in WeeFIM 

Potential Solution Pathways 

You are free to resolve this Challenge by developing your prototype in whatever means you may like. Our mentors, partners and organising team have thought of the following techniques as being viable methods to resolve the Challenge: 

  • Predictive models for dosage for ABI, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, other diagnosis 
    • For children with CP dosage consider the hospital intervention they have received: Botox injections and Orthopaedic surgery 
  • Predictive models for resource allocation and an improved (automated) user interface for scheduling 
    • Consider aligning types of therapies received (in outpatient appointment type data) with the COPM domains. Examples: 
      •  COPM goal domain of “Self-Care: Mealtimes” can be supported by OT and Speech Therapy 
  • Simulation models of patient flow from acute to subacute inpatient to iRehab intensive outpatient care – see patient flow diagram 

Glossary 

ABI Diagnosis group: Acquired brain injury 

Botox Intervention: botulinum toxin injection 

CP Diagnosis group: cerebral palsy 

COPM Assessment: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure 

F-words in Childhood Disability The six areas that are the focus in childhood disability: functioning, family, fitness, fun, friends, future. 

GAS Assessment: Goal Attainment Scaling 

iRehab Program: The intensive rehabilitation program at Kids Rehab WA 

Kids Rehab WA The PCH paediatric rehabilitation department 

MCID Minimum Clinically Important Difference 

NDIS National Disability Insurance Scheme 

OT Discipline: Occupational therapy 

PCH Perth Children’s Hospital 

PRIS Paediatric Rehabilitation Information System – Kids Rehab WA clinical database 

PT Discipline: Physiotherapy 

RiC Program: Rehab in the Community program at Kids Rehab WA 

SP Discipline: Speech therapy 

SCI Diagnosis group: spinal cord injury 

WeeFIM Assessment: Functional Independence Measure for Children